Fatigue Performance of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Compared With Standard Trajectory Pedicle Screw.

نویسندگان

  • Yusuf Tahiri Akpolat
  • Serkan İnceoğlu
  • Nolan Kinne
  • Devon Hunt
  • Wayne K Cheng
چکیده

STUDY DESIGN Cadaveric biomechanical study. OBJECTIVE To determine fatigue behavior of cortical bone trajectory (CBT) pedicle screws. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Cortical bone trajectory screws have been becoming popular in spine surgery; however, the long-term fatigue behavior of the new CBT screws remains understudied and limitations not well defined. METHODS Twelve vertebrae from six cadaveric lumbar spines were obtained. After bone mineral density (BMD) measurements, each vertebral body was instrumented with screws from each group, that is, CBT (4.5 × 25 mm) or standard pedicle screw (6.5 × 55 mm). A load (± 4 Nm sagittal bending) was applied under displacement control at 1 Hz. Each construct was loaded for 100 cycles or until 6° of loosening was observed. After fatigue testing, the screws were pulled out axially at 5 mm/min. RESULTS The standard pedicle screw showed better resistance against 100 cycle loading compared with the CBT screws (P < 0.001, 6.9° ± 4.8° vs. 15.2° ± 5.5°, respectively). The standard pedicle screw testing usually required more than 100 cycles of loading to achieve the critical loosening (3592 ± 4564 cycles), whereas the CBT screw never exceeded 100 cycles (84 ± 24 cycles) (P = 0.002). Increased BMD was significantly associated with a higher number of cycles and less loosening. The standard pedicle screw group had a higher postfatigue pullout load than the CBT screw group (P = 0.001, 776 ± 370 N and 302 ± 232 N, respectively). CONCLUSION The standard pedicle screw had a better fatigue performance compared with the CBT screw in vertebra with compromised bone quality. The proper insertion of the CBT screw might be prevented by the laminar anatomy depending on the screw head design. The CBT screw damaged the bone along its shaft by rotating around a fulcrum, located at either the pars, pedicle isthmus, or the junction of the pedicle and superior endplate, contingent upon the strength of the bone.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Cortical Bone Trajectory for Pedicle Screw Insertion.

P edicle screw fixation for spinal stabilization is now commonplace in spine surgery. Traditionally, pedicle screws are placed through a trajectory in which screw insertion utilizes a transpedicular path through the axis of the pedicle, either paralleling the end plate, as in the straightforward trajectory, or following the anatomic axis of the pedicle with an approximately 22° cephalocaudal tr...

متن کامل

Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Achieving solid implant fixation to osteoporotic bone presents a clinical challenge. New techniques and devices are being designed to increase screw-bone purchase of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine via a novel cortical bone trajectory that may improve holding screw strength and minimize loosening. Preliminary clinical evidence suggests that this new trajectory provides scr...

متن کامل

The Cortical Bone Trajectory: An Alternative to Traditional Pedicle Screw Fixation - A Review

The cortical based trajectory for pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine is not a novel as it once was. This is a review of the background, indications, advantages, disadvantages of cortical based trajectory pedicle screw fixation with an emphasis on biomechanical evidence and recent clinical studies which only now are just coming to light.

متن کامل

Erratum to: A biomechanical comparison between cortical bone trajectory fixation and pedicle screw fixation

Erratum After publication of the original article [1] it came to our attention that the legends for figures 2 and 3 had been interchanged. The correct legend for figure two is 'Pedicle screw fusion model' and the correct legend for figure three is 'Cortical bone trajectory model'. biomechanical comparison between cortical bone trajectory fixation and pedicle screw fixation. permits unrestricted...

متن کامل

Should we use cortical bone screws for cortical bone trajectory?

OBJECT In 2009, Santoni et al. reported cortical bone trajectory (CBT) as a method of inserting pedicle screws to obtain more solid fixation, and proposed the use of cortical trajectory screws with a more closely placed thread (cortical screws) for CBT. Since the entry trajectory in CBT differs from that in the traditional trajectory, it is unclear whether the increased strength derives from th...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Spine

دوره 41 6  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016